What's the difference between the words "fish" and "fishes",? This was explained to me a few weeks ago in a lecture about fishes (and if you feel I've left anything out, please let me know):
Fish (I'm just dealing with the noun form, pertaining to language used by aquarists, keep in mind) can mean an individual or a group of the same species of fish.
Fishes, on the other hand, deals specifically with the plural of two or more species.
So does this mean that the sentence "I eat a lot of fish." is wrong if you enjoy eating salmon, tuna, yellowtail, barramundi, and other types of fishes? I don't think so, but I'll ask around.
Anyhow, on to the pictures. One fish pictured is a gar. The other fish is a goldfish. One of them ate the other one, and though the outcome was predictable, I was not expecting to see the following play out.
I don't know enough about gars to hazard a guess at which species this is, but I can tell you that it is the King (or Queen) of the tank.
Maneuvering by using mostly its muscular pectoral fins, the gar slowly positions itself for a meal.
The attack is lightning fast, and devastating to the goldfish. Pressure sensitive canals are lined up along its snout, and function much like a lateral line, letting the gar sense changes in water pressure. It attacks by lining its prey up right next to its mouth, and then snapping it up with its needle-like teeth while flexing its body to one side.
For some reason, the gar spat out its meal, and started to drag the disemboweled goldfish around. It reminded me of a master walking his dog.
After a few minutes, the intestines finally snapped, and the gar finished its grisly meal.
Comments (6)
You are forgetting the almighty rendering of FISHIES. Tiny, tasty, little fishies. Only pertains to those with scales, I think.
Posted by: Justin | March 29, 2007 6:30 PM
Posted on: March 29, 2007 18:30
Gars are truly the apex predator in their local habitats. I think the biggest is the Alligator Gar that inhabits the Rio Grande. I must say the meal in the photos looks regurgitated. Are the feeders fed live or dead? I would imagine to placate the viewing public, feeders are fed dead. Of course, for many of us - watching the live feeders getting eaten is the only way to go.
Posted by: Architeuthis | March 30, 2007 9:58 AM
Posted on: March 30, 2007 09:58
This gar does not reside at MBA. Its home is Hopkins Marine Center next door where it is a pet, thus not bound by the tolerances of the general public.
The feeder was first offered to a venomous cone snail, which rejected it, thus falling into the maw of the gar.
It was not regurgitated. It was utterly destroyed by the snap of the bigger fish. Harakiri. Literally.
Is the gar not a badass fish?
Posted by: Adam | March 30, 2007 3:17 PM
Posted on: March 30, 2007 15:17
Gar sounds like "arrrgh" which gives the toothy predator an even more sinister shadow. Watching goldfish get killed quickly by a gar is far better than watching those little green headed puffers nip away little by little as the tortured goldfish tries to wiggle away. Feels a bit like the inhumane chopping away of trapped dolphins by gleefully sadistic humans, huh?
Posted by: yomama | March 31, 2007 12:56 PM
Posted on: March 31, 2007 12:56
A bit early but here it goes - Happy birthday to you, happy bd to u, h b dy dear Adam, h bd t u! Will you be celebrating with a fishy dinner - maybe some Gar which may be short for you know what?
Posted by: Aunt Min | April 1, 2007 4:45 AM
Posted on: April 1, 2007 04:45
Brutal! but judging from the shape of its unique "mouth piece", i reckon that's the best way to attack its "meal"?
are gars are protected species? somehow one ended up in one of our (SG) reservoir. Dead, somehow got strangled in a disuse net. how it end up there? we suspect another sad case of owner who got bored of this exotic pet.
Posted by: slurp! | April 3, 2007 1:11 PM
Posted on: April 3, 2007 13:11